Code of Ethics Training Requirements for 2021

All members of the National Association of REALTORS® are required to complete at least 2.5 hours of an approved Code of Ethics training within a three-year cycle.
The current three-year cycle began January 1, 2019. This REALTOR® membership requirement must be satisfied by December 31, 2021.
The purpose of this ongoing training is to enhance professionalism and competency, heighten awareness of the key tenets of the Code of Ethics and to encourage REALTORS® to view the Code as a living, viable guide in their dealings with clients, customers, and the public.
Check my Code of Ethics Status

To satisfy this membership requirement, you may:
Submit evidence of an approved course completion to

Attend a free NAR Triennial Ethics course with VPAR.  These courses are provided virtually. You will see these courses marketed to the membership by email, Face Book and on our calendar.

Attend a CE Required Ethics course at VPAR. These courses will be provided both in-classroom and virtually. To view upcoming dates and to register, visit our

Complete a free training online from NAR This option does NOT provide CE credit.

Earn the NAR Commitment to Excellence (C2EX) endorsement This option does NOT provide CE credit.

Take the course online via The CE Shop

REALTOR® Appraiser members and Commercial REALTOR® members are required to complete an approved ethics training course as they subscribe to the Code of Ethics and are bound by its obligation. However, REALTOR® Emeritus members are exempt from this requirement. For more information, visit NAR.Realtor.

Members who have attended New Member Ethics Orientation after January 1, 2019 are not required to complete additional ethics training until the next three-year cycle beginning in 2022.

Failure to complete the required ethics training shall be a violation of a membership duty for which membership is suspended and subsequently terminated.

If you have any questions about this membership requirement please email Cindy Anderson at

Mold Remediation Legal Issues Being Tested – What Property Managers Can Do Now !

Almost a decade ago the General Assembly enacted legislation requiring landlords to remediate visible evidence of molds.  More importantly, the same duty was imposed upon property managers who assumed maintenance responsibilities. This was a complete departure from Virginia law which prevented tenants from maintaining civil actions against a real estate licensee who acted exclusively on behalf of the landlord.


Earlier this month, the Virginia Supreme Court reviewed a decision from the Newport News Circuit Court in which the trial judge concluded that the enactment of this statute was intended to abrogate personal injury claims based upon negligent maintenance or remediation.  I represented the landlord and property manager in this case and regrettably, the Virginia Supreme Court disagreed with the Trial Court’s legal conclusions, reversed the decision and returned the case to Newport News for further proceedings.


Also disappointing was the Supreme Court’s failure to address the extent to which mold remediation is required.  The statute, as well as the Virginia Residential Landlord Tenant Act (“VRLTA”), defines visible mold as “the existence of mold in the dwelling unit that is visible to the naked eye by the landlord or tenant in areas within the interior of the dwelling unit readily accessible at the time of the move-in inspection.”  I argued that because the molds accumulated months after the tenancy began, there was no duty to remediate as the molds were not visible at the time of the move-in inspection.  This issue is now back before the Trial Court, but it is my considered opinion that the statute is clear and unambiguous.  If the move-in report disclosed no visible evidence of mold, the duty to remediate stopped there.


While the duties and responsibilities continue to be addressed by Virginia tribunals, I offer the following recommendations to reduce the risks associated with mold.


  • Give mold disclosures at the commencement of the lease, obtaining every tenants acknowledgement of receipt;
  • If visible evidence of mold exists at move-in in readily accessible areas, “readily accessible” being defined as “areas within the interior of the dwelling unit available for observation at the time of the move-in inspection that do not require removal of materials, personal property, equipment or similar items”, postpone the tenants occupancy. The statue requires remediation in five (5) days, a practical impossibility.
  • For molds that accumulate during the tenancy, although there is likely no statutory duty to remediate, the VRLTA requires premises to be maintained in a fit and habitable condition. Fortunately, for VRLTA violations, personal injury damages are not recoverable;
  • In the remediation of molds, engage certified mold remediation contractors to ensure compliance with the requirement that the remediation is performed “in accordance with professional standards.” Virginia law does not entitle a tenant to recover damages caused by the negligence of an independent contractor;
  • If a tenant reports mold accumulations, explore whether any occupant believes exposure to mold may have adverse health effects. If the tenant answers affirmatively or is uncertain, offer to terminate the lease, with owner approval, or relocate immediately;
  • Negligence claims arise principally as a result of the failure to properly repair the source of water leaks and the failure to follow proper protocols in the remediation of mold. When a tenant communicates a service request for any condition that could lead to moisture or water conditions, give these special attention;
  • Review property management agreements to ensure that the Owner is responsible for maintaining the premises in accordance with laws, regulations and local ordinances. DO NOT agree to except primary responsibility for maintenance, reserving only the right to effectuate emergency repairs;


  • Most importantly, contact your commercial general liability and errors and omissions liability carriers to ensure that there is coverage for mold claims. Too often I find clients who are uninsured because of fungus, mold or pollution exclusions.


The issues related to mold remediation present a legal quagmire, particularly when Virginia courts have yet to definitively rule on what duties are owed by landlords and property managers.  Consult with your legal counsel when you have questions regarding the proper course of action.


Herbert V. Kelly, Jr.| Jones, Blechman, Woltz & Kelly, P.C.

701 Town Center Drive, Suite 800, Newport News, VA 23606 | Direct 757.873.8149 | Fax: 757.873.8103 |

NAR’s Legal Action Program

Published on Mar 11, 2016

The purpose of the Legal Action Program is to provide financial assistance to REALTORS®, associations, Multiple Listing Services, property owners, and others engaged in litigation that may have important precedent significance to the real estate industry.